Saturday, October 12, 2013

David Gorin On Negative Criticism

In the Boston Review, David Gorin in his essay "Negative Review: The Claudius App" goes negative on critical take-downs suggesting they are no more honest or free of careerism than so-called positive reviews. Here is an excerpt:


"To my mind, the notion that negative reviews are a dialectical antidote to the vague praise and careerist back-patting often found in poetry reviews is founded on a mistake. There is no good reason to think that negative reviews are ipso facto any more honest, more intelligent, freer of strategy, instrumentality, or profit-motive than positive reviews. Negative is not the same as critical. The negative reviewer is shrewd enough to moneyball the marketplace: he understands that in an economy rife with praise-inflation, vitriol can code as honesty, and ridicule may seem refreshing because it is so rare. His operation risks devolving into spectacle. The idea that negative reviews should be more “honest” or “refreshing” than positive reviews is symptomatic of the fantasy that there might be a place where the dynamics of economy and careerism are suspended, and the voice of truth can pour forth undiluted by ulterior motives. The main problem with negative reviews is that they’re too similar to positive reviews. The poetry criticism I admire most spends less time praising or blaming—which often amounts to leveraging the reviewer’s cultural capital and verbal virtuosity to muscle readers into assimilating that reviewer’s taste—and more time describing and contextualizing with intelligence and gusto. Of course, no reviewer could ever remove his taste or politics from his descriptions; the very choice of an object for attention is a function of such things. But I think we’d all learn a lot more about what’s happening in poetry if reviewers leaned less heavily on overt statements of aesthetic judgment, positive or negative, and more on close analysis."

- David Gorin, "Negative Review: The Claudius App"

Friday, October 11, 2013

Upcoming Fall Readings

        Thanksgiving is already upon us! I have a few readings coming up over the next week. 

         I will be reading Wed. Oct. 16,  7:30 pm, at the Landon Branch of the London Public Library, 167 Wortley Rd as part of the Poetry London Reading Series

         The following day Thurs. Oct. 17, I am heading to Hamilton to give readings from 4:40-5:30 pm at Redeemer University College  and later that night 7:30-9:00 pm at Bryan Prince Bookseller, 1060 King Street West for the Hamilton Poetry Society

         I will be reading poems from my last book Winter Cranes published by ECW Press as well as some new work. All are welcome.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Dusk Til Dawn



Dusk Til Dawn


You imagine the moon filling a bedroom window
as the towering screen of a drive-in movie theatre
high above a winter field strewn with melt-water.
Soon cars prowl past the ticket booth’s closed sign.
An unlighted snack bar hunched in snow and rain 
gathers a crowd. The moth-stutter of faint images
flicker from a projector filled with stopped clocks.
Someone has already begun to lay aside his clothes
in a borrowed car. Someone’s white bare shoulder
is sending a boy’s desire up in flames, burning him.
Someone feels branded by delight. Even on a night
as cold, as ordinary as this evening, somewhere it is
the summer of 1985 and Back to the Future is playing.
Somewhere people stagger in-between rows of cars,
drinking beer, laughing heartily, suspecting nobody
will ever grow old, or expire, or be forgotten again.
Many are wrong for it is already tomorrow’s music
leaking out of FM radios, speaker poles like crosses
marking the graves of teens who came before them,
until someone finds himself locked out of some car,
twenty years older, and an adolescent girl, with skin 
more white than the moon’s pale winter, long dead
from a car crash. What happened two decades ago.
Someone wishes he could go back to another time
to loiter under a different moon, in another century,
but already there is a fight in the parking lot. Already
police are gathering at the entrance waiting for dawn
to come, for people to finally get tired and go home, 
while someone drunk yells come on!, holds up his fists
unaware the invisible projectionist who is smoking
absentmindedly, dusting ashes off one last cigarette,  
stares out his little window knowing how it all ends.


By Chris Banks

Monday, May 6, 2013

The Transgressive and the Fantastical: Elizabeth Bachinsky and Sara Peters

      Elizabeth Bachinsky's The Hottest Summer in Recorded History, by Nightwood Editions, and Sara Peters’ 1996, by House of Anansi Press, ask more from their respective audiences than casual reading. These books demand participation from readers. If you are looking for poems bound together with easy observations, or a familiar jog through a personal lyric, you will come away disappointed. Both Canadian poets attempt to do quite the opposite: to undomesticate the world, to set things on fire with their minds, to rattle the cages of readers and by doing so, to reinvigorate the imagination.


Bachinsky’s book begins with the lines “I can see now that I once was quite feral. / Getting older was my education in becoming civilized” from the poem “You Know What Readers Like”. This is an apt description for how a reader feels when reading her poems for although the point of view is decidedly personal, the “voice” in her poems displays a powerful self-awareness suspicious of where it finds itself. Bachinsky’s book is rife with images of urban sprawl and superficiality—googling blondes, Telly Savalas, Nails salons, Venice Beach—all of which are treated by the poet as memento moris of a western civilization in decline. A popular culture that has become a plastic church.

This cocktail of high and low culture might be dismissed by others as mere ‘cool-hunting’, Bachinsky angling for a kind of bohemian sophistication, except for the fact that the wilderness intrudes in many of the poems. There is a picture postcard-worthy lake that is actually only three feet deep and choked with ragweed. A mountain rises in the distance above a passing train full of commuters. The speaker in another poem rides her thorough-bred horse through an empty subdivision where there are “no trees, just a razed cow field / where developers built and we moved in.” This poem ends with the lines, “my big dark horse, waiting / for me to come on back / outside” which implies nature on the ragged fringes, living outside society’s frame, is a place of spiritual renewal.

Take, for example, her poem “The Spider’s Alphabet” which appears in its entirety below:

The Spider’s Alphabet

Once in rural Japan my good friend Allan joined a fascinated throng
   in watching a white spider meander across a market square,

a white spider whose body was fat as a man’s hand whose slender
   legs tested the earth as a woman’s might test the surface of a lake

mid-May—then it moseyed. And when I first moved from the city
   to the woods outside Vancouver, I evicted two from my laundry

room, an old married couple, bodies each a good inch long, grey-brown.
   They were pissed. They lived without a web. They were hunters’

the whole length of their basement window replete with corpses:
   fat blackflies, millipedes. A real nice set-up. I screamed!

But all summer in the press room, I have watched a thin brown thing spin
   webs behind the type cases. And I have thought of E.B. White,

his Charlotte, and what I would do with my Charlotte after she,
   feeling safe, spun her pale yellow sac near the small window

that opens onto your derelict English garden. I watched the sac hatch
   and for weeks afterwards I found spiderlings among the liagatures.

We worked together. Me, dissing type while the little ones wove
   through the alphabet. Now—the wolves who stalk through

my house at night?—they keep my tabby entertained.
   In the day, I leave my windows open, and my doors. Yet how

pest-free my house remains! Some nights I dream of eight eyes and wake
   to unexpected cash. Strange. This fall when I move back to

the city with its silverfish and exorbitant rent, I think I will summon
   spiders. It is best to live with them. To let them into the house.

By Liz Bachinsky

There is so much to love in this poem — the white spider and the fascinated Japanese throng, the move between the city and the woods, the allusion to E.B. White’s Charlotte's Web — all of which implies a connection to nature is important because it resets or awakens the imagination. This is certainly how I take the meaning of the last lines where the speaker says, “Strange. This fall when I move back to / the city with its silver fish and exorbitant rent, I think I will summon / spiders. It is best to live with them. To let them into the house.”

     What Bachinsky places squarely in her cross-hairs in The Hottest Summer in Recorded History is not only urban-planning run amok but the gentrification of consciousness. Just when readers find themselves getting too comfortable in a poem, out come the bull-whips and the tiny wooden armadillos, the hobbled horses and the jimmied keyholes, the plastic paparazzi playsets and the zombie finger puppets. 

     Elizabeth Bachinsky uses her bursting lyricism and wide-ranging eye to seek the borders between the feral, i.e. the wild, and a recycled culture so obsessed with its own past it is unable to create any new meaning.

     Sara Peters also wants to make her readers uncomfortable in her new book 1996, but she does this more directly, employing an overtly surrealist approach. ”As a teenager, there are several ways to get your parents’ attention. / Only one of these ways is to set things on fire with your mind.” So begins Sara Peters’ poem “Mary Ellen Spook” and it quickly sets her readers on pins and needles for her poems work against easy observation.

     Like Bachinsky, Peters creates tension between things familiar and fabulous, leaving her readers feeling unfixed and detached. There is a dream-like quality to many of her poems. In “Bionic”, a twenty-two year old brother believes he is bionic and is looking after a senile mother whom he dresses in a t-shirt that reads, “I kill everything I fuck // I fuck everything I kill.” In “Your Life as Lucy Maud Montgomery”, a menacing Ann of Green Gables makes an appearance carrying a butterfly knife. In “Camden 14”, a boy sets himself on fire in the middle of a neighborhood.

     Reading her poem “Cryptid” below, it becomes clear how Peters employs surreal imagery to create a dream-like atmosphere, both transgressive and distorted, in order to shake up her readers.

Cryptid

You saw her once, at Margaree Harbour,
when you were a three-year-old boy called Oscar.

While you staggered over the sand,
slippery with SPF 50,

your parents humped on the beach towel,
to Lou Reed singing “Sweet Jane.”

Lipless, lidless, five slits in her throat,
her rosy larynx furled in and out.

You laughed at her boa: seaweed, rusted forks.
She tore up a starfish, swallowed its points.

You offered, as truce, some Sun-Maid raisins.
She spread out, to amuse you, all forty fingers.

Finding you gone, your father sprinted over the sand
(long-legged, in one Birkenstock)

While your mother stayed right there!, sat on her heels,
gasping into a brown paper bag.

Later, your parents noticed the salt taste of your skin,
called you their potato chip.

Your mother combed sand from your hair,
your father found beach grass in your bed.

Now they sleep to the sound of rogue waves crashing. Dreaming,
they pick their way through dying jellyfish

to find you waiting (not for them) behind a rock,
content amid the iridescent quivering.

By Sara Peters

Immediately, readers are swept into this dream-like scene with the use of the second-person pronoun transforming them into a three year old boy named Oscar. The parents dry-humping on a beach towel, the eerie lilting guitar and dead-pan bluesy voice of Lou Reed singing “Sweet Jane”, the sea-creature with her boa of seaweed and rusted forks, all of these images evoke the poem’s chimerical fantasy, which reminds me here a little of a poem by Larry Levis “Inventing the Toucan”.   

     It is as if Peters, distrustful of mimicry or imitation of any kind, fears her images will fade into a poem’s background, becoming mere wallpaper, so awakens or ignites her audience’s attention by allowing her poems to participate in the fantastical and the surreal. 

     Sara Peters’ large-minded speculative vision is not interested in a carbon copy world of appearances, but in the “throbbing interior” of her imagination.

     Stanley Plumly has said, “Resemblances are our masks for meaning” but both Bachinsky and Peters never let their readers get too comfortable with such masks. Please pick up Elizabeth Bachinsky’s The Hottest Summer in Recorded History, published by Nightwood Editions, and Sara Peters’ 1996, published by House of Anansi Press, at your local bookstore. 

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Larry Levis “On Accessibility”


“I wasn’t consciously trying to make anything accessible, nor was I trying, on the other hand to be obscure or priestly, as the Modernists tried to be. I have nothing against being accessible. I think there’s certain pleasure in that—the poems being vulnerable to being understood. A lot of young poets don’t want to be understood, because they feel that when they’re understood, they’re dead. But I think that fear only comes from criticism—the vast inhibition they get from reading critics who, because they can understand something, simply decide not to deal with it. I think it’s very difficult to deal with a fantastically complete, utterly accessible lyric by Thomas Hardy, which already says everything it intends to say. It defies criticism. It says Harold Bloom or Helen Vendler, sure, come ahead, say what you have to say: I’ll make you look hopeless.

Donald Justice comes to mind in this way. He wanted to write a poem so completely that the only thing he could say about it that would be accurate would be its recitation. Larkin thought that, too. You’ll find very little high-powered criticism about Larkin. You can’t do it. His poetry is too shrewd, too cunning, too mean. Scrupulously mean as Joyce said. Now I like that….as a method in art. Not because I have anything against criticism, which is unavoidable and necessary and as natural as breathing…But to make a poem that absolutely declares everything, one that has no hidden resources or anything—I mean, that’s another idea, you see.”

(from an interview Leslie Kelen conducted with Larry Levis in Antioch Review; Summer 90, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p. 284, 16 p)  

Friday, March 29, 2013

Poetry Month and Spring Books 2013


     Poetry month is fast approaching and I am already thrilled by the fine selection on offer from Canada’s poetry publishers this spring. 

     I am eagerly anticipating the full slate of new collections published by Nightwood Editions this season. I have started reading Elizabeth Bachinsky’s The Hottest Summer in Recorded History and Sara Peter’s 1996, published by House of Anansi press, and a blog post about both of these lovely books is starting to take shape. 

     Russell Thornton has a brand new collection Birds, Metals, Stones and Rain with Harbour Publishing that I am keen to dig into, and Tim Bowling’s Selected Poems is out in hardcover which is a terrific achievement from one of Canada’s best poets. Afloat by John Reibatanz, For Display Purposes Only by David Seymour, The Civic-mindedness of Trees by Ken Howe and A Nervous City by Chris Pannell will round out the rest of my spring reading list.

     As for my own scribbling, I wish I was writing more poetry at this time of year, but teaching and being a father keep me occupied. I hope to finish my poetry chapbook Invaders sometime in late summer, and a manuscript of essays I have been gathering together over the last couple of years is in the final stages.

     Finally, the poet Barry Dempster was kind enough to ask me to be part of a Canadian Poetry celebration at the Richmond Hill Public Library on April 6 from 1-4 pm. Barry and I will be reading along side fantastic poets John Steffler, Susan Gillis, Maureen Scott Harris, and Susan Glickman. It should be a fun afternoon.